winning press freedom
conference
China and the Internet: History, Economy and Human Rights
By Wolfgang Kleinwächter
China has the world’s most dynamic Internet market. In December 2007,
there were 210 million Chinese people online. Right after the United States,
with 215 million Internet users, China now has the second largest Internet
community. And with a growth rate of 53% in 2007 and a penetration rate of
only 21% (compared to more than 80% in the United States) there is still an
enormous market potential. It can be expected that China will soon be the
Internet No.1 nation.
Yet, China also has one of the most restrictive Internet domestic
policies. When it comes to freedom of expression on the Internet, a mix of
governmental regulation, policing activities and technical mechanisms keeps
the flow of information content via the Internet under political control.
Critical web sites are taken down, Internet Cafes are closed, cyber
dissidents are arrested. The annual Internet Freedom Report, produced by
Reporters Without Frontiers, ranks the People’s Republic of China a very low
no. 164, out of around 170 countries.
1. History
The Internet is still a new media in China. The country was connected to
the Internet in 1987. But until 2000, the Internet was practically
non-existent in Chinese daily life.
When the first e-mail was sent from a server of the Institute for
Computer Applications (ICA) of the Technical University in Beijing to a
server of Karlsruhe University in Germany on Sept. 20, 1987, practically no
one took note of that historic event. It took more than 15 years to reach
the level of 1 million users in a country with a population of 1.3 billion.
1.1. The Chinese-German academic research project: Linking China to the
Internet Root;
Establishment of a network connection between Beijing and Karlsruhe was
the result of a joint Chinese-German academic research project that had
started back in the mid-1980s. Prof. Werner Zorn of Karlsruhe University,
one of the fathers of the German Internet, was deeply involved in connecting
Germany to the Internet when he linked in 1984 a university server in
Karlsruhe to a server of the US Computer Science Network (CSNET). Three
years later, Zorn became also one of the “fathers of the Internet” for
China.
When Prof. Zorn visited Beijing in 1987, he worked with Prof. Wan Yung
Feng of the Chinese Commission on Science & Technology. Both managed to
install a name server for China’s .cn domain and to connect it to the name
server of Germany’s .de domain. The text of the first e-mail was rather
simple: “Across the Great Wall we reach now all corners of the world.” That
short sentence was the first step on the long Chinese march into cyberspace.
A simple technical solution was in fact a rather problematic and
complicated political project. It came during the Cold War. On the one hand,
COCOM regulations, established by NATO, did not allow transfer of highly
sensitive communication technology and relevant software to communist
countries like the People’s Republic of China. On the other hand, Chinese
authorities were very suspicious of “Western spies” and “ideological
diversion.”
Rather unwatched by governmental representatives, Zorn and his colleagues
used their creativity and flexibility to make the project happen. A great
help was also Zorn´s international reputation, his recognition within the
Internet community and his good personal contacts with Internet pioneers in
the United States who also became excited about the challenge of helping
Chinese academics open the door to the West.
After a series of individual efforts on various levels, the name server
of the Chinese Top Level Domain (ccTLD) .cn was finally successfully linked
to the authoritative Internet Root Server System (RSS). Zorn helped -- in
cooperation with Stephen S. Wolff of the US National Science Foundation
(Wolff oversaw NSFnet) and Lawrence H. Landweber, co-founder of the CSNET
(which connected many countries to the Internet in the 1980s) -- to
introduce the .cn root zone file into the IANA data base and to get final
approval by the US government to authorize publication of the .cn root zone
file in the A-Root server in 1990.
The two letter code .cn, which became the ccTLD for China, was listed on
the ISO 3166 list. From the early 1980s, the ISO list was used by Internet
pioneer Jon Postel of the Information Science Institute (ISI) at the
University of Southern California (USC) in Marina del Rey as a database for
the delegation of the management of a ccTLD. Postel managed the IANA
database and the global Domain Name System (DNS) from its creation in the
early 1980s.
Then, delegation of a ccTLD was done mainly with a handshake and without
great formalities, to a trusted manager with Jon Postel’s personal
confidence. Governmental authorities were not involved. Nevertheless,
authorization for publication of a TLD root zone file in the A-Root Server
needed confirmation by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). NSF funded
Internet development in the US from the mid-1980s. It needed also
authorization by the US Department of Commerce (DoC). The first delegation
for management of the .cn domain was handed out by Jon Postel to Werner
Zorn.
When Zorn returned to Karlsruhe in 1988, he continued to manage to .cn
domain. A copy of the relevant data base of the .cn name server remained in
Beijing, but day to day management of the .cn domain was done by Zorn from
his office in Karlsruhe. This was not a big deal because only a small number
of domain names were registered under .cn.
1.2 CNNIC: From 10,000 to 10 million registered domain names
In 1994, management of the .cn domain was re-delegated to the Chinese
Academic Network (CANET), a subsidiary of the Chinese Academy of Science.
Three years later, in 1997, based on a government regulation, the “Chinese
Internet Network Information Center” (CNNIC) was established and took over
full responsibility for management of the .cn domain.
Fewer than 10,000 Internet domain names were then registered under .cn.
This number grew at a marginal growth rate, to 50,000 by 2001 and to 430,000
in 2004. The explosion started in 2005, when the number of registered domain
names crossed the 1 million mark. By the end of 2006 there were 1.8 million
domain names registered, by mid-2007 6 million and by the end of 2007 9
million. With this number, the .cn registry had become the world’s second
largest ccTLD, after DENIC. DENIC manages .de for , with 11.8 million
registered domain names.
The China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) of the Academy of
Sciences is the ccTLD registry for the .cn TLD and the main Internet body in
China. It is a government agency but was founded as a non-profit
organization under Chinese law on June 3, 1997. CNNIC takes its orders from
the Ministry of Information Industry (MII) for its daily business, while it
is administered by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). A CNNIC Steering
Committee, a working group of well-known experts and commercial
representatives from the domestic Internet community, supervises and
evaluates the structure, operation and administration of CNNIC.
The legal basis for CNNIC is laid down in the “China Internet Domain Name
Regulations” of Sept. 28, 2004. According to the regulation, anybody -- both
individuals and institutions -- has the right to register a domain name.
CNNIC follows the “first come, first served principle” used worldwide as the
standard procedure for domain name registration.
Yet, some names are blacklisted and excluded from registration. According
to Article 27 of the Regulations “any of the following contents shall not be
included in any domain name registered and used by any organization or
individual:
1) Those that are against the basic principles prescribed in the
Constitution;
2) Those that jeopardize national security, leak state secrets, intend to
overturn the government, or disrupt of state integrity;
3) Those that harm national honor and national interests;
4) Those that instigate hostility or discrimination between different
nationalities, or disrupt the national solidarity;
5) Those that violate the state religion policies or propagate cult and
feudal superstition;
6) Those that spread rumors, disturb public order or disrupt social
stability;
7) Those that spread pornography, obscenity, gambling, violence,
homicide, terror or instigate crimes;
8) Those that insult, libel others and infringe other people’s legal
rights and interests; or
9) Other contents prohibited by laws, rules and administrative
regulations.”
Various other regulations by the MII specify the mandate and the tasks of
CNNIC in more detail, including the “CNNIC Implementing Rules of Domain Name
Registration” from 2002 and the “Rules for CNNIC Domain Name Dispute
Resolution Policy” from 2007.
CNNIC has the full responsibility for the registration of Domain Names in
the .cn Domain and the allocation of IP addresses. It is responsible for
management of relevant data bases, for technical research and statistical
surveys. CNNIC hosts the secretariat of the Internet Society of China (ISC).
ISC is not an official chapter of the global Internet Society (ISOC), based
in Geneva and California, but an independent, purely Chinese organization.
1.3 China and ICANN
CNNIC is also the authorized contact for international Internet
organizations, including the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers (ICANN), a private non-profit corporation that manages on behalf of
the global Internet community critical Internet resources -- root servers,
domain names, IP addresses-- on a worldwide basis. ICANN, which now also
manages the IANA data base, was established in 1998 by the US government and
is headquartered in Marina del Rey, California. ICANN is governed by an
international Board of Directors (BOD) and operates under a Joint Project
Agreement (JPA) with the US Department of Commerce. The JPA expires in
October 2009.
The Chinese government is officially a member of ICANN’s Governmental
Advisory Committee (GAC) but does not participate in its regular meetings
while Taiwan remains an equal GAC member. However, China hosted an official
ICANN Board meeting in Shanghai in 2001. Just recently, ICANN`s new Board
Chair, Peter Dengath Trush, got a warm welcome in Beijing and met CNNIC
Director General Mao Wei on Feb. 19, 2008. Hualin Quian, deputy director of
the CNNIC Steering Committee and Vice-Chair of ISOC China, was from 2003 to
2006 a voting member of the ICANN Board. Xue Hong, a Graduate of the Chinese
Academy of Social Sciences and Assistant Professor at the Foreign Affairs
College of the Hong Kong University, served in ICANN’s At Large Advisory
Committee (ALAC) from 2005 to 2007. Since 2007, CNNIC has officially been a
member of ICANN’s Country Code Name Supporting Organization (CNSO).
1.4 Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan
Next to the .cn Domain there are also ccTLDs for Hong Kong .hk (managed
by the Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Ltd. /HKIRC with 152,000
registered domain names in 2007) and for Macao .mo (managed by the Macao
Network Information Center at the University of Macao with only 2,075
registered domain names in 2007). Both ccTLD registries are managed
independently, have their own rules and individual policies but operate
under the same general regulations as CNNIC.
The ccTLD .tw of Taiwan is managed by the Taiwan Network Information
Center (TWNIC) with about 50,000 registered domain names. TWNIC is also a
member of ICANN’s CNSO and stresses its status as an independent ccTLD for
Taiwan. As noted above, the government of Taiwan is also a full member of
the GAC, which is not accepted by the government of the People’s Republic of
China. Regardless of the political controversy over Taiwan, there is a
businesslike relationship between CNNIC and TWNIC on the working level,
particularly on technical issues.
1.5 gTLDs in China
Chinese individuals and institutions can also register Domain Names under
a generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) like .com, .net, .org or .info. However,
the popularity of such gTLD registration is shrinking.
On the one hand, domain name registration under .com still enjoys a high
growth rate. But in comparison with registrations under .cn, the .com
domain, managed by the US company VeriSign, is losing ground. In 2005, about
40% of all domain names in China were registered under .com. By the end of
2007 this had fallen to 20%. Nevertheless there are 2.4 million domain name
registrations under .com in China. The domain .net is the third strongest
Internet domain in China with a market share of 3.3% -- a total of 390,000
domain name registrations. Other gTLDs like .org or .info have no more than
1.1% market share or a bit more than 100,000 registrations.
In March 2006, CNNIC started to register domain names under .com and .net
with Chinese characters but without the involvement of VeriSign. As outlined
below, the iDN issue with regard to Chinese Domain Names (CDN) is still in a
test phase and under discussion.
2. Economy
Until the late 1990s there was no such thing as a Domain Name Market or
an Internet Economy in China. Only a limited number of academics from
technical research institutions had access to the Internet. Today, China is
a rapidly growing market for thelocal and global Internet economy. With more
than 200 million Internet users within China’s mainland not only domain name
registration but all kinds of online applications and services offer untold
business opportunities.
2.1 Growth of the Domain Name Market
The primary domain name market had a growth rate of 190.4% in 2007. That
growth is bound to continue after full introduction of domain names with
Chinese characters, the so-called internationalized Domain Names (iDNs),
also on the TLD level (iDN.iDN).
Growth of domain registration is mainly driven by market needs for
eCommerce and other commercial applications and services. Yet, eCommerce is
still in its infancy in China. According to a statistical report by CNNIC
for 2007, only 22.1% of the Chinese Internet users do shopping online. For
2007, this represented no more than 46.4 milion Yuan (or 4.2 million €).
Compared to the United States, where 71% of Internet users are online
shoppers, and the volume of e-Commerce is more than 5 billion, the volume of
Chinese e-Commerce is still very low.
2.2 Search Engines, ISPs and Online Games
Search Engines are one of the key Internet markets in China. For a number
of years, the market leader has been the national Internet search engine
www.baidu.cn with a market share of 62%. The second most popular search
engine in China, www.google.cn, has just 24% market share. The remaining 14%
is distributed among various local Chinese search engines and Chinese
branches of international portals like www.yahoo.cn or www.msn.com.cn.
The ISP market is growing fast. There are about 100 ISPs. Nine ISPs have
allocated more than a million IP addresses to customers in China. China
Telecom with 47 million allocated IP addresses and a market share of about
30% is the leader, followed by China Netcom (25 million), CERNET (12
million) and China Tietong Corporation (7 million).
One of the most dynamic Internet markets in China is the online
entertainment industry with Shanda Entertainment in the lead, followed by
Softworld and ZT Network Science Technology. Kou Xiao Wei, a governmental
representative from the Audiovisual and Internet Publication Department of
the General Administration of Press and Publication (GAPP) told the People’s
Daily newspaper in February 2007: “The online Chinese gaming market has
become the biggest, internationally recognized, potential market. In 2006,
the scale of the online Chinese gaming market reached 6.54 billion Yuan
(about 600 million €), an increase of 73.5% from 2005, much higher than the
forecast 46.3%. Such strong growth can be attributed to the ‘free service’
model. It is undeniable that there are still gaps between China and other
nations in terms of software development. However, the innovative business
mode of Chinese game providers has won approval from many of their foreign
counterparts.”
2.3 Beyond the Olympics: Leapfrogging into the Next Generation Networks?
The forthcoming Olympic Games in Beijing in August 2008 are seen as a
driving force for dramatic improvement of the national Internet
infrastructure and for introduction of new Internet-based applications and
services with long-term economic and social consequences. China wants to
become the leading world IT nation by the year 2015.
Ruoqi Guan, President of the China Network Communications Group (CNC)
told the Pacific Telecommunication Conference (PTC) in Honolulu in January
2007 that there will be 300 million broadband connections for high speed
Internet access in China after the Olympic Games. That number would make
China the world’s No.1 in broadband connections. According to Guan, this
will make it easy for Internet users in China to switch also to VOIP and
IPTV. In 2000, there were fewer than a million broadband connections.
There are plans to turn Beijing with its 17.4 million inhabitants, and
other Chinese urban centers into “Wireless Cities,” where everyone has
fulltime free Internet access. According to Kai Li Kan from the School of
Economics & Management at the University for Post & Telecommunication in
Beijing, such a model would be “led by the government, built by the people”.
In the A2K conference at Yale University in New Haven, Conn., in April 2007
, Kai Li Kan dreamed of an Internet “of the people, by the people, for the
people,” recalling Abraham Lincoln`s characterization of the ideal
government in his Gettysburg Address in 1863.
2.4 Internet Usage: More eEntertainment than eCommerce
The Internet in China is now mainly used for information and
entertainment, less for eGovernment or eCommerce. According to a report by
CNNIC the most popular Internet services in China are Online Music and
Instant Messaging/Chat Rooms.
181 million users (or 85.6%) had been listening to online music in the
second half of 2007. Heavy use of online music explains also the success of
the search engine www.baidu.cn which offers special searches for MP3 files.
More than 170 million Internet users (or 81.4%) in China had used instant
messaging or had gone to a chat room in the second half of 2007. For about
40% of users, this is the most important and first reason for use of the
Internet. It is specially popular among young people between 18-24 years, of
whom 96% regularly use instant messaging. Interestingly, instant messaging
is used more in underdeveloped regions in the west of China than in the
booming regions on its east coast.
Other top applications are Online Video (161 million or 76.9%), Search
Engines (152 millions or 72.4%) and Online News (154 million or 73.6%). Of
special importance are Internet games (124 million or 59.3%). Online
game-playing is particularly popular among young people. About three
quarters of youngsters below 18 play online games regularly, spending around
10 hours per week for playing games. Interestingly, low income and low
education people make the highest use of Internet games compared to other
groups and applications. Internet game playing is even more popular than
e-mailing. 118 million netizens (or 56.5%) use e-mail services.
Personal web sites and blogs have a high growth rate. The CNNIC report
states that at the end of 2007 nearly 25% of Chinese Internet users had
their own web sites, which means that there are nearly 50 million individual
blogs. Less popular are Online Job Hunting (21 million or 10.4%), Online
Payment (33 million or 15.8%), Online Education (38 million or 18.2%) and
Online Banking (40 million or 19.2%). Official e-government services,
according to the CNNIC report, are underused. Only a quarter of China’s
netizens use state services offered by the national and local authorities.
While the Chinese government supports development of a national Internet
economy by encouraging e-Commerce and other commercial activities on the
Net, it tries to keep control of the national domain name space and in
particular over content distributed via the Internet within China,
3. Human Rights
Article 35 of the Chinese Constitution of 1982 guarantees, that “Citizens
of the People’s Republic of China enjoy freedom of speech, of the press, of
assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration” Furthermore,
Article 40 guarantees the freedom and privacy of correspondence: “No
organization or individual may, on any ground, infringe upon the freedom and
privacy of citizens’ correspondence except in cases where, to meet the needs
of state security or of investigation into criminal offences, public
security or procuratorial organs are permitted to censor correspondence in
accordance with procedures prescribed by law.” According to Article 41,
citizens of the People’s Republic of China have the right to criticize and
make suggestions to any state organ or official. “Citizens have the right to
make to relevant state organs complaints and charges against, or exposures
of, violation of the law or dereliction of duty by any state organ or
functionary.” But the article adds that “fabrication or distortion of facts
with the intention of libel or frame-up is prohibited.”
Regardless of the liberal language of the constitution, China is widely
seen as one of the world’s most restrictive countries when it comes to
freedom of expression on the Internet. There is a huge gap between theory
and practice.
All the constitutional rights and freedoms are conditioned by general
provisions to protect national security, public order and state secrets. In
cases of conflict, the interests of the state or the government have a
higher value than the rights of individuals. With references to the “higher
values” of society, censorship is justified, and individual rights and
freedoms are often reduced to a low level, particularly when sensitive
political issues are at stake.
3.1 The “Harmonious Internet”
The concept of the “harmonious Internet”, which is propagated by the
Chinese government, is designed to “clean the Internet” from criminal
activities, piracy, pornography and “bad information.” Philosophically, it
is inspired by a mix of Confucianism, a special interpretation of the
Ying-Yang principle and power politics of the Communist Party. To simplify,
the concept says that all good things on the Internet should be promoted,
but bad things should be suppressed.
From a Western perspective, the problematic element to that approach is
that there are very vague definitions of what constitutes “bad information.”
There are no independent and neutral third parties with authority to
evaluate concrete cases in conflicts between rights and freedoms of
individual netizens and the political interests of the state or government.
The Chinese government uses various means to implement the concept of a
“harmonious Internet.” They include:
- governmental regulation (there are more than 30 individual
content-related Internet regulations both on the national and local
level),
- technical means (blocking and filtering of unwanted content),
- policing the net and
- punishing individuals identified as violators of government
regulations.
The State Council Information Office has the mandate to regulate the
Internet, but other security agencies in mainland China also have a say.
In September 2000, State Council Order No. 292, created the first content
restrictions for ICPs . China-based web sites may not link to overseas news
web sites or carry news from overseas media without specific approval. Only
“licensed print publishers” have the authority to publish news on-line.
Unlicensed web sites that wish to broadcast news may only publish
information already publicly released by other news media. These sites must
obtain approval from state information offices and from the State Council
Information Agency . Article 14 of this Order, gives Chinese officials full
access to any kind of sensitive information they wish: “ […] an IIS provider
must keep a copy of its records for 60 days and furnish them to the relevant
state authorities upon demand in accordance to the law.” Finally, Article
15, officially establishes an online dictatorship: “IIS providers shall not
produce, reproduce, release, or disseminate information that: […] endangers
national security, … is detrimental to the honor of the state, … undermines
social stability, the state’s policy towards religion, … other information
prohibited by the law or administrative regulations.” Article 12 says that
“content providers are responsible for ensuring the legality of any
information disseminated through their services.”
3.2 The Golden Shield Project
One key element is the so-called “Golden Shield Project” (GSP) which
critical Western observers also call the “Great Chinese Firewall.” The GSP
is overseen by the Ministry of Public Security (MPS). It is seen by the
Chinese government as a main instrument to guarantee the stability and the
security of the Internet in China, to combat “bad information” and to work
for a “healthy Internet.”
According to Wikipedia the following methods are used to block “bad
content”:
- IP blocking. Access to a certain IP address is denied. If the target
web site is hosted in a shared hosting server, all web sites on the same
server will be blocked. This affects all IP-based protocols such as
HTTP, FTP and POP. A typical circumvention method is to find proxies
that have access to the target web sites, but proxies may be jammed or
blocked, and some web sites, such as Wikipedia (when editing), also
block proxies. Some large web sites like Google have allocated
additional IP addresses to circumvent the block, but later the block was
extended to cover the new IPs.
- DNS filtering and redirection. Don’t resolve domain names, or return
incorrect IP addresses. This affects all IP-based protocols such as
HTTP, FTP and POP. A typical circumvention method is to find a domain
name server that resolves domain names correctly, but domain name
servers are subject to blockage as well, especially IP blocking. Another
workaround is to bypass DNS if the IP address is obtainable from other
sources and is not blocked. Examples are modifying the Hosts file or
typing the IP address instead of the domain name in a Web browser.
- URL filtering. Scan the requested Uniform Resource Locator (URL)
string for targeted key words, regardless of the domain name specified
in the URL. This affects the HTTP protocol. Typical circumvention
methods are to use escaped characters in the URL, or to use encrypted
protocols such as VPN and TLS/SSL.
- Packet filtering. Terminate TCP packet transmissions when a certain
number of controversial key words are detected. This affects all
TCP-based protocols such as HTTP, FTP and POP, but Search engine results
pages are more likely to be censored. Typical circumvention methods are
to use encrypted connections - such as VPN and TLS/SSL - to escape the
HTML content, or by reducing the TCP/IP stack’s MTU/MSS to reduce the
amount of text contained in a given packet.
- Connection reset. If a previous TCP connection is blocked by the
filter, future connection attempts from both sides will also be blocked
for up to 30 minutes. Depending on the location of the block, other
users or web sites may also be blocked if the communication is routed to
the location of the block. A circumvention method is to ignore the reset
packet sent by the firewall.
- Web feed blocking. Increasingly, incoming URLs starting with the
words “rss,” “feed,” or “blog” are blocked.
- Reverse surveillance. Computers accessing certain web sites
including Google are automatically exposed to reverse scanning from the
ISP in an apparent attempt to extract further information from the
“offending” system.
Control is excercised mainly via the ISPs, which must follow government
instructions (on blocking suspected IP numbers and domain names) and to
transfer individual contact data to Chinese law enforcement in special cases
where the government sees a breach of Chinese law, mainly with regard to
criminal activities, pornography or to efforts to undermine national
security, public order or to give away so-called “state secrets” by
publishing “bad news.”
Another form of control is strong regulation of Internet Cafes, where
many Chinese, particularly in rural areas, access the web. Internet Café
providers must follow strict regulations, otherwise they are closed. There
is no anonymity for individual Internet Café users. Users must register and
give their personal contact data before they may use a computer in an
Internet Cafe.
The “Regulations on the Administration of Internet Access Service
Business Establishments (Internet Cafes) of Sept. 29, 2002, state in Article
23: “Units operating Internet Access Service Business Establishments shall
examine, register, and keep a record of the identification card or other
effective document of those customers who go online. The contents of the
registration and records shall be maintained for at least 60 days, and shall
be provided to the cultural and public security agencies for examination in
accordance with the law. Registration contents and records shall not be
altered or destroyed during this period.”
3.3 Can it be Circumvented?
There are numerous studies by Western universities, including from the
Berkman Center of Internet & Society at Harvard Law School, on Internet
Censorship in China which survey various policies and praticies to censor
the Internet in China.
There is, however, no obviously clear and consistent policy. Researchers
at the University of California, Davis and the University of New Mexico have
found that the GSP is not a true firewall since banned material can
sometimes pass through several routers or through the entire system without
being blocked. It differs also from region to region. Web sites that are not
accessible in the western part of
China can be easily accessed in Shanghai. Servers in Hong Kong obviously
have more individual freedom than servers in Beijing. There are also
variations at different times. There are reports that during summit meetings
or other official events with high-level Western presence, forbidden web
sites are accessible but are blocked again after the events. The New York
Times has observed that “the government’s filtering, while comprehensive, is
not total. One day a banned site might temporarily be visible, if the
routers are overloaded -- or if the government suddenly decides to tolerate
it. The next day the site might disappear again.”
Other reports document that the firewall is rather easily circumvented by
determined parties using proxy servers outside the firewall. VPN and SSH
connections to outside mainland China are not blocked, so circumventing all
of the censorship and monitoring features of the Great Firewall of China is
easy for those who have available such secure connection methods to
computers outside mainland China. Anonymizer Inc. provides a free service to
allow uncensored and anonymous browsing in China. The software is available
through a number of sources, including a China-accessible web site.
Psiphon, a software project designed by University of Toronto’s Citizen
Lab, is another circumvention technology that works through social networks
of trust and is designed to help Internet users bypass content-filtering
systems. Furthermore, Tor (The Onion Router), a free software, enables users
to communicate anonymously on the Internet. Neither the Tor website nor the
Tor network are blocked, making Tor an easily acquired and effective tool
for circumvention of the censorship controls. Tor allows, inter alia,
uncensored downloads and uploads, although no guarantee can be made on
freedom from repercussions.
In addition to Tor, there are various HTTP/HTTPS Tunnel Services, which
work like Tor. At least one of them, Your Freedom, is confirmed to be
working from China and also offers encryption features for the transmitted
traffic.
Some legal scholars have pointed out that the frequency with which the
PRC government issues new regulations about the Internet is symptomic of
their ineffectiveness since new regulations never refer to the previous set
of regulations, which appear to be forgotten.
3.5 Punishment of Cyberdissidents and Self-Censorship
Expectations, that in the leadup to the Olympic Games, scheduled for
August 2008 in Beijing, the restrictive system would be substantially
liberalized, were disappointed during recent events around the unrest in
Tibet in March 2008. Numerous web sites were blocked, blogs were taken down
and individuals who uploaded pictures or videos of violence in Lhasa were
arrested.
The number of cases where Chinese netizens who distributed “bad content”
via the Internet were punished and sent to jail for expressing themselves
online is growing. The recent annual report of Reporters Without Borders
lists nearly 50 cases in 2007in which individuals or journalists were jailed
and given Draconian sentences of several years in prison just for making
critical statements that, in the eyes of the Chinese government, undermined
national security, public order or were seen as revealing “state secrets.”
These cases have produced growing self-censorship. Not only individual
bloggers, but also professional journalists are increasingly careful about
expressing their views, particularly on critical political affairs. One
journalist was quoted in the Reporter Without Borders report, saying that in
his newspaper, staffers now wait for the official news from the Chinese
state news agency Xinhua before writing their own comments, to be sure to
get it right and to avoid trouble with local or national authorities.
3.6 The Role of US Internet Companies
A special case is the Yahoo affair of 2005. The Chinese branch of Yahoo
Inc. disclosed the individual contact details of two Chinese cyberdissidents
to Chinese authorities after an official government query. Wang Xiao Ning
and Shi Tao were both sentenced to several years in prison. This case
produced a storm of protest in the West. Human rights groups accused US
companies of helping the Chinese government’s censorship and of ignoring
human rights obligations. Microsoft, Google and Cisco -- all very active in
the Chinese Internet market - also became targets of that kind of Western
criticism.
The US Senate had a special hearing on the issue in February 2006.
Representatives of the so-called “Gang of the Four” acknowledged the human
rights problem in China but partly rejected the criticisms of US government
representatives and human rights groups. Google, Yahoo, Cisco and Microsoft
argued that they must respect local legislation when doing business in
China, just as Chinese companies must respect US laws when doing business in
the United States. They said it was beyond the powers of a US corporation to
change Chinese laws and that it is rather the concern of the US government
to use its diplomatic influence to change China’s laws.
Google explained in detail that they are, on the one hand, well aware about
the human rights deficiencies in China and the risks of doing business
there. On the other hand, like in any other country where Google is active,
they must follow national legislation when they operate in the local market.
Consequently, they filter out references to content that is illegal under
Chinese law but give as much information as possible to their Chinese users
about blocked and censored web sites. Furthermore, they avoid hosting data
containing criticisms of China and information of individual Chinese
Internet users, using Google’s g-mail or chat room services on servers
located in China.
Thus, www.google.cn is rather different from www.google.com. Users of
www.google.cn will get no links to web sites that are considered under
Chinese law to be “illegal.” But Google informs its Chinese users that such
content is available and can be reached via www.google.com. Google applies
the same approach also in other countries like Germany or France where web
sites with Nazi content are illegal under national laws and so are not shown
in Google searches on www.google.de (Germany) or www.google.fr (France).
Google also does not respond to phone calls from Chinese authorities with
requests to hand over the stored data of individual users. If Google gets
such phone calls, they ask for a written request referring to existing
legislation. Practice has shown that many such phone requests are not
followed up with written requests.
3.7 Diplomatic Negotiations: How to balance individual rights with
State interests?
Internet freedom in China has also become controversial internationally.
At the UN World Summits on the Information Society (WSIS) in 2002 and 2005,
at the UN’s Internet Governance Forum (IGF) and at the newly established UN
Human Rights Council, the issue has been debated by government
representatives and other stakeholders from the private sector, civil
society and the technical and academic community.
Diplomatic efforts to improve the situation have led so far to only
limited results and have not gone beyond reconfirmation of existing
international human rights instruments, notably Article 19 and Article 29 of
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948. Article 19 guarantees to
everyone the right to freedom of expression and opinion which includes
“freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and
impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers,”
while Article 29 stipulates that “everyone has duties to the community in
which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible”
and that “in the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be
subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the
purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms
of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and
the general welfare in a democratic society.”
In democratic societies, conflicts between the individual’s exercise of
freedom of expression and the governmental right to protect public order are
settled by an independent judiciary or neutral third parties on a case by
case basis, generally giving individual rights and freedoms highest
priority. In China, priority is given to the State’s collective rights of
“public order” and “national security.”
The issue of how to balance such conflicting values in concrete cases
concerning publications on the Internet in China has also become a
frequently discussed subject at international academic conferences. During a
July 2007 meeting in Paris of the International Association of Media and
Communication Research, a Chinese scholar recognized, on one hand, that
there has been substantial progress on individual rights of freedoms of
expression, including the Internet, during the last 20 years. What would
have been impossible in 1987 is now common practice, he said. On the other
hand, there are still taboos which, when they are ignored by individuals,
are not tolerated by the government and lead to heavy punishment. The
“Chinese taboos” he mentioned in particular were the three T`s (Tianamen,
Tibet and Taiwan) as well as references to Falun Gong.
Another scholar, Andrew Lih, a Chinese-American professor at the
University of Hong Kong, said that many in China take a long-term
perspective. “Chinese people have a 5,000-year view of history,” he said.
“You ban a web site, and they’re like: ‘Oh, give it time. It’ll come back.’
“
3.8 Violation of Human Rights as a Trade Barrier?
There are two schools of thought in Western academe and amongst
non-governmental organizations in this field: One group argues that with
more economic progress, a higher living standard and a new self-confident,
well-educated generation, the spaces for individual freedom will gradually
grow. The other group does not believe in such an evolutionary concept.
Under discussion is, inter alia, a proposal to classify the violation of
human rights, particularly censorship measures against freedom of
information, as constituting trade barriers. Under World Trade Organization
arrangements, violations of international treaties to protect intellectual
property rights are already defined as trade barriers. As recent experiences
have demonstrated, the Chinese government, after pressure from WTO member
states, has undertaken concrete actions against online piracy, to guarantee
the protection of intellectual property rights under its international
obligations, thus avoiding negative consequences for its economic interests.
In contrast, violation of international obligations under global legal human
rights agreements has until now been nearly without economic consequences
for countries like China.
Cold War experiences in Europe in the 1970s and 1980s (notably the
effects of the Helsinki agreements) might provide interesting leads for
action, but it remains to be seen whether such mechanisms would also work in
the rather different political, economic and cultural environment of China.
3.9 Internet Governance at the UN World Summit on the Information Society
(WSIS)
During the first UN World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) in
Geneva, the Chinese Delegation played an active role, particularly in the
discussions of human rights and of Internet governance.
The Chinese government challenged in particular the evolution of
governance mechanisms for the management of critical Internet resources like
domain names, root server and IP addresses, which are led by the private
sector and executed by Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.
ICANN operates under a contract with the US government, which expires in
October 2009.
During WSIS Phase 1, China argued that the principle of private sector
leadership was good for the early days of the Internet with about a million
Internet users. With about a billion Internet users worldwide, critical
Internet resources should now be governed by governments, China contends. A
proposal to shift responsibility for root servers, domain names and IP
addresses from ICANN to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) or
to create a new intergovernmental Internet body in the UN system was
rejected by the US government, the EU, private sector and civil society but
was supported by a number of developing countries like Brazil, India,
Pakistan, South Africa and some Arab states. In the absence of an accepted
definition of Internet governance, another conflict was a rather
controversial approach to what “Internet Governance” stands for. Some
governments adopted a “narrow definition,” and others a “broad” one.
The controversy -- private sector leadership vs. governmental leadership
-- was not settled during WSIS I. The compromise was to ask UN Secretary
General Kofi Annan to establish a Working Group on Internet Governance
(WGIG) with a mandate to arrive at a definition of Internet governance, to
identify the public policy aspects of Internet governance and to specify the
role of the various stakeholders. WGIG was not established as an
intergovernmental working group but as a multi-stakeholder body with the
full and equal involvement of governments, private sector and civil society
representatives from developed and developing countries. The Chinese
representative in WGIG was Madame Qiheng Hu, Advisor to the Science &
Technology Commission of the Ministry of Information Industry and former
Vice President of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
The WGIG report, presented in July 2005, paved the way for a “grand
compromise” during WSIS II. Based on a “broad definition” of Internet
governance, it concluded that the Internet should not be governed by one
single unit but by a global mechanism, that includes various stakeholders --
governmental as well as non-governmental -- in their respective roles. WGIG
proposed neither governmental nor private sector leadership for the broad
range of Internet issues but recommended a “multi-stakeholder approach.” It
encouraged the various players in such a “multilayer mechanism” (M_) to
enhance their communication, coordination and cooperation (C_).
After the presentation of the WGIG Report, China no longer insisted on
the transfer of responsibilities from the private sector (ICANN) to the
governmental sector (ITU) but agreed finally on the establishment of a
multi-stakeholder Internet Governance Forum (IGF) instead of a new
intergovernmental body. China also supported the launching of a process of
“enhanced cooperation” amongst involved international institutions and
organizations, including ICANN and ITU in the “Tunis Agenda for the
Information Society.”
The first priority for China in WSIS II was recognition of the principle
of sovereignty over its national domain name space. In Paragraph 63 of the
Tunis Agenda, governments agreed that “countries should not be involved in
decisions regarding another country’s country-code Top-Level Domain (ccTLD)”
and that “their legitimate interests, as expressed and defined by each
country, in diverse ways, regarding decisions affecting their ccTLDs, need
to be respected, upheld and addressed via a flexible and improved framework
and mechanisms.” This assurance, that China has legitimate sovereignty
rights under international law made it easier for the Chinese government to
join the general compromise on the IGF and the process of enhanced
cooperation. In practice, this is a de facto recognition of ICANN and the
principle of private sector leadership for management of Critical Internet
Ressources (CIR).
3.10 The Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
In the public consultations on the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), which
advises the UN Secretary General in convening the annual IGFs, the Chinese
representative proposed to include also the issues of Critical Internet
Resources as a subject of discussion, a proposal which was broadly accepted.
The IGF is, however, not a negotiating body and has no decision-making
function. The concept of the IGF is to promote multi-stakeholder debate, to
exchange ideas, information and arguments and to send “inspirational
messages” to specialized bodies that are mandated to make decisions. The
Chinese member of the IGF Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) is Tang
Zicai, Deputy Director, Department of Foreign Affairs in the Ministry of
Information Industry (MII).
Within the IGF, which started in Athens in October 2006, China gave the
issue of “Cybersecurity” highest priority. During the IGF II in Rio de
Janeiro, November 2007, the Internet Society of China (ISC) and the China
Association for Science and Technology (CAST) organised a workshop on the
“New Culture of Cybersecurity.” During that workshop, Prof. Sihan Qing,
Director General of the Engineering Research Center for Information Security
Technology (ERCIST) under the Chinese Academy of Sciences proposed a
document called a “Framework on World Norm of Internet (Version 2.0).”
That document is drafted like an international treaty, with rights and
duties for various stakeholders. The author says he does not intend to
present it as a draft convention. It is “neither a legislative regulation,
nor a technical standard, it is rather a self-disciplinary agreement,” says
Sihan Qing.
Among the proposed principles are, under Chapter B, the following
paragraphs: “1 It is requested that all information created for, and
contributed to, the Internet be trustworthy and valuable for the evolution
of human being and prosperity of the world. 2. The contents created for, and
contributed to, the Internet should be trustworthy and valuable for
maintaining human ethics and morality, for the protection of privacy and
human rights, for the protection of all people, particularly women and
children, disabled people and weak group of people. 3. The contents created
for, and contributed to, the Internet should be trustworthy and valuable to
all nations and people, regardless of race or creed. 4. It is requested that
the operators of the networks take on the responsibility for making efforts
to keep the high reliability and high quality of services (QoS). 5. It is
requested that the users of Internet be strictly observe the related
regulations when accessing and utilizing the Internet. 6. All nations and
individuals should go along shoulder to shoulder to take all measures to
defeat various attacks and cyber crimes, such as Trojans, viruses, worms,
spyware, spam and phishing.” And paragraph 2 of Chapter E calls for a new
international Internet authority: “It is needed to have an organizational
authority to monitor the quality of services maintaining, diagnose the
faults of operations and arbitrate disputes.”
The proposed “Framework on World Norm Internet 2.0” (a first version was
presented at the first IGF in Athens in October 2006) has not so far gotten
formal backing of the Chinese government. As noted above, the IGF is not a
decision-making body and formal proposals like the “Framework” are not
subjects of negotiation (but the drafters have said they hope it will
eventually be adopted -- where and by whom being left open). It remains to
be seen whether such ideas will stimulate further debate and lead to
political actions in relevant institutions and organizations, including
inter-governmental organizations.
4. Looking into the future: Towards a fragmented Internet?
How will the Internet look in ten years and what role China will play in
the Internet of the future? The list of challenges is long: Access,
cybersecurity, diversity, openness, next generation networks, network
neutrality, non-fixed location Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), mobile
Internet etc. When it comes to future management of critical Internet
resources, there are two key issues where China will have to play a crucial
role: Internationalized Domain Names (iDNs) and IPv6 Addresses.
4.1 Internationalized Domain Names (iDNs)
One of the key Internet problems for China is the introduction of
internationalized domain names (iDNs). When the DNS was invented by Jon
Postel and Paul Mockapetris 25 years ago, it was based on the ASCII code, a
shortened version of the Latin alphabet. This has put individuals and
institutions using non-Latin characters in their national languages at a
disadvantage. Use of local languages in the addressing system is also a
crucial element to bring nations with languages not based on the ASCII code
into the Internet more efficiently.
Technical experiments with iDNs started in the 1990s, mainly within the
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), a non-governmental Internet
standardization body of technicians and engineers. After 2000, ICANN started
a special program to implement iDNs, both at the secondary and the primary
(top) levels (iDN.iDN). But while iDNs on the secondary domain level were
introduced in 2004, introduction of iDNs on the Top Level created unexpected
technical and political problems.
Some experts, like Jon Klensin from the Internet Architecture Board (IAB),
the umbrella organization of the IETF, pointed to the enormous challenge for
the capacity of routers if they must deal with different language tables
with hundreds of non-ASCII characters. He warned of “cosmic confusion” and a
collapse of the DNS. Otherwise, ICANN`s so-called JCK (Japanese, Chinese,
Korean) working group concluded that the technical problems related to
language tables in scripts with symbols instead of Latin letters can be
managed. Next to the technical problems, the issue of “ownership of a
language” became a political issue. Established gTLD registries like
VeriSign, the registry for .com or .net, argued that their gTLD may be
considered a trademark that should have protection in all language
variations, including Chinese. Alternatively, China’s representatives argued
that the Chinese language is owned by the Chinese people.
Regardless of numerous workshops, studies and working groups, the
implementation process within ICANN did not move forward at high speed.
China was dissatisfied with the slow progress in ICANN and developed its own
system. CNNIC started in March 2006 a test with iDNs on the TLD level, so
called “Chinese Domain Names” (CDN). The first test was limited to .cn, .net
and .com with Chinese characters. CNNIC established its own root server
system to manage communication amongst the new TLDs. Linkage to the global
legacy root server system was guaranteed by a special procedure that added
automatically in each query, the ASCII-based .cn TLD to an iDN.iDN address.
This was not visible for the user in the Chinese mainland, and it only
created problems for Chinese users outside of China if they forgot to add
the .cn in ASCII to the e-mail or web-address with Chinese characters.
Reports on the results of this test were not available at this writing.
Separate language-based Internet root server systems have the potential
to split the Internet. It can lead to fragmentation of the global unified
Internet. Such a split -- some people call it the “Balkanization of the
Internet” -- would not mean the “end of the Internet” as we know it but
would lead to new complications and challenges for coordination. To maintain
the standard of universal communication, there would be a need to build
bridges between different language-based networks and to introduce very
complex cooperation mechanisms.
From an economic and technical viewpoint, such a fragmentation would be
very counterproductive. There would be disintegration of the unique value of
the internet, with its current 1.3 billion users who can all communicate
with each other anywhere, anytime. Changing root server systems when moving
from one language to another would create additional technical problems and
lead to inefficient time-consuming and costly bureaucratic procedures.
Separate roots could lead also to more control opportunities over the
communication flow within a specific language root, particularly if all root
servers of such a network are within the territory of a single country.
Bridges between language-based networks could be designed as gateways that
can be passed only with special governmental permission. That could backfire
against the social and economic needs of a society and lead to isolation and
backwardness.
To avoid such a trend toward fragmentation of the Internet, ICANN has
speeded up its procedures and started in 2007 a so-called “fast track” for
introduction of iDN.iDN on a ccTLD level for 11 non-ASCII language scripts,
including complex and simplified Chinese. Part of this project is to offer
China the possibility of a .cn TLD with Chinese characters in the IANA data
base and in the legacy root server system. China has welcomed ICANN’s fast
track iDN ccTLD efforts. ICANN Chair Peter Dengath Trush visited Beijing in
February 2008, and assured CNNIC that “the fast track process of IDN ccTLD
[really] will be fast.” There is a strong economic incentive for China to
remain with CDNs on the top level in the global legacy root, but it remains
to be seen how potential contradictions between China’s national economic
and political interests are worked out internally and how the use of Chinese
characters in TLD zone files will finally make its way into the legacy root
server system coordinated by ICANN.
During the ICANN meeting in Los Angeles in October 2007, another problem
appeared when CNNIC representatives challenged use of both traditional and
modernized Chinese on an equal basis in ICANN`s test phase. In mainland
China, modernized Chinese dominates, while in Taiwan traditional Chinese
script is more popular. CNNIC proposed that there be just one Chinese script
in the test phase and then to provide for local variations under one main
language table. The conflict was diluted both by CNNIC and TWNIC, who called
it just a technical, not a political, issue.
4.2 IPv6 Addresses
The issue of the new addressing system - IPv6 - is of similar complexity.
It is expected that the old version of the IP protocol - IPv4 - will reach
its limits and be saturated in 2012. ICANN has dealt with the IP address
issue for several years through its Address Supporting Organization (ASO),
in close cooperation with the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) and the
Number Resource Organization (NRO).
China has its own National Internet Registry (NIR). Chinese ISPs can get
IP addresses both from the NIR and the Asian-Pacific RIR (APNIC). Chinese
officials have been arguing that they do not have enough IPv4 address
blocks. But a transition to IPv6, which offers a rather unlimited number of
addresses, also creates a number of technical and political problems that
are still being discussed.
One technical problem is the interoperability between the two protocols.
For a longer transition period, full interoperability between IPv4 and IPv6
addresses is needed. But existing protocols allow only interoperability from
IPv4 to IPv6 and not from IPv6 to IPv4. So, there is another risk that the
Internet could be split into two networks, one based on IPv4 addresses and
another on IPv6 addresses.
Furthermore, with the introduction of IPv6, the established procedure of
a flexible allocation of IP addresses following specific needs of day to day
communication could terminate and be substituted for by a procedure that
would give every individual or institutional Internet user a fixed IP
address for life. Like a passport number, such fixed IP addresses could
become a key element in authentication processes on the Internet. That would
raise many data protection, privacy and human rights questions. It would
also allow a much higher level of control of individual Internet
communication.
4.3. Conclusions
China will soon be the Internet’s nation No. 1, supplanting the United
States as the country with the largest number of users. China will have the
largest national Internet community. It will have the largest number of
domain name registration under a ccTLD, and it will have the largest number
of broadband access points. It will have also the largest number of
individual web sites and blogs.
However, Internet development in China is characterized by a huge
contradiction between economic interests and human rights practices. While
there is an open policy toward promotion of the private sector in the
Internet economy, including access for everybody to the ‘net, there is also
a restrictive government policy when it comes to access to and distribution
of information content by and free communication amongst individual Internet
users.
It remains to be seen what the mid- and long-.term consequences of that
contradiction between economic development and human rights will be in
China´s internal evolution and its integration into the global community.
Wolfgang Kleinwächter is a professor of Internet Policy and Regulation
in the Department for Media & Information Studies at the University of
Aarhus in Denmark. He is Co-Chair of the Law Section of the International
Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR), co-founder of the
Global Internet Governance Academic Network (GIGANET) and was a member of
the UN Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG)
|